Difference between revisions of "USER FEEDBACK FORMS"

From Process | Spoken-Tutorial
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with ''''You are here''': Main Page >> Spoken Tutorial Processes >> USER FEEDBACK FORM '''Name of the User:'''<br> '''Date:'''<br> '''Name of the Spoken Tutorial:'''<br> <b…')
(No difference)

Revision as of 17:47, 10 January 2013

You are here: Main Page >> Spoken Tutorial Processes >> USER FEEDBACK FORM

Name of the User:

Date:

Name of the Spoken Tutorial:



TOPIC

Criteria Yes No
Topic suggested is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)
No spoken tutorial available on the proposed topic in any language on the portal
No spoken tutorial available on the proposed topic in any language on any
of the suggested links


EXAMPLE

Criteria Yes No
The examples are related to the topic
The number of examples illustrated are adequate
Examples are easy to comprehend with
It is difficult to explain this topic without these examples


SCRIPT

Beginning of the Script
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Brief introduction of the topic given
Learning objectives clearly mentioned
Prerequisites clearly mentioned
Is it mentioned that the script is part of a series?
Additional plug-ins required clearly mentioned


Content covered
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Contents are covered in an interesting and enthusiastic manner
Script focuses on the key feature(s)
Each feature in the tutorial is explained properly
Flow of information acceptable
Simple and short sentences used
Difficult words not used
Instructions conveyed are informative and not vague
The tutorial introduces simple concepts and then gradually moves to the advanced level


End of the Script
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Quick summary given at the end of the script is useful
Assignment given at the end of the tutorial helps improve learning


URL and other resources
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Information about the source of the external links provided
External links point to free resources
External links provided are active
Information provided in the external links relevant and useful


STUDY PLAN

Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
I prefer to learn through this Study Plan
Tutorials in the Study Plan are arranged in the correct sequence
Study Plan helpful in comprehending the tutorials in a better way
This study plan is better than the already existing study plan
Suggestions on topics to make the study plan better

(This is a place where the user can type the text for the topics that he suggests)


SPOKEN TUTORIAL

Audio
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Audio loud and clear
Pace of audio appropriate
Audio has a natural accent
Tone is friendly


Narration
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Easy to understand
Content covered is appropriate


Video
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Text readable
No irrelevant cursor movements
Video quality good
Video in synch with the audio



Summary for Spoken Tutorial
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Overall experience pleasant
Would like to learn other software through spoken tutorials
Still unclear with certain concepts discussed in the tutorial


DUBBING

Script
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Additional content is not introduced in the translated script
None of the original content has been left out
Meaning of the content hasn't changed during translation
Common words like 'computer', 'windows', 'mouse' 'click' 'menu' has been kept neutral

(Not every single word needs to be translated. Changing every word will confuse the
listeners. Again this could change the meaning of the content)

Simple and short sentences used
Difficult words not used
Instructions conveyed are informative and not vague


Audio
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Audio loud and clear
Pace of audio appropriate
Audio has a natural accent
Tone is friendly


Narration
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Easy to understand
Content covered appropriate
Dubbed Tutorial corresponds with the original Tutorial


Video
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Audio in sync with the transitions and cursor movement on the screen
Text readable
Video quality good


Contributors and Content Editors

Nancy varkey, Sanmugam