Difference between revisions of "RCL"
From Process | Spoken-Tutorial
(Created page with ''''You are here''': Main Page >> Spoken Tutorial Processes >> REVIEWER'S CHECKLIST '''Name of the Reviewer:'''<br> '''Date:'''<br> '''Name of the Spoken Tutorial:'''<b…') |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 12:58, 14 December 2012
You are here: Main Page >> Spoken Tutorial Processes >> REVIEWER'S CHECKLIST
Name of the Reviewer:
Date:
Name of the Spoken Tutorial:
click here to download PDF forms of the checklists
Ratings to be done on the scale of 1 to 5 wherever required.
Contents
TOPIC
| CRITERIA/STATEMENTS | YES | NO |
|---|---|---|
| Is the topic suggested Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)? | ||
| Is the version number of the Software clearly mentioned? | ||
| Is any spoken tutorial available in any language on the suggested topic either on the portal or on any link? |
||
| Is suggested topic Operating System dependent? | ||
| Is the name of the Operating System clearly mentioned? | ||
| Is the difficulty level stated by the contributor? |
EXAMPLE
| CRITERIA/STATEMENTS | YES | NO |
|---|---|---|
| Is the example(s) relevant to the topic? | ||
| Is the example correct and without errors? | ||
| Is the example(s) easy to understand? | ||
| Are adequate number of examples illustrated? | ||
| Would it be difficult to comprehend the topic without this example(s)? | ||
| According to you, is this the best example(s) that can be used to explain the topic? |
SCRIPT
Beginning of the Script
| CRITERIA/STATEMENTS | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Brief introduction of the topic is appropriate | |
| Learning objectives mentioned, are clear | |
| Objectives in tandem with the content of the tutorial | |
| Prerequisites mentioned are clear | |
| Mention of the tutorial being a part of a series, is made clear | |
| Name and version of the software is made clear in the script | |
| Mention of the Additional plug-ins required, is clear |
Content covered
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Content is covered in an interesting and enthusiastic manner | |
| Script focuses on the key feature(s) | |
| Appropriate explanation of each feature is given in the tutorial | |
| Flow of information is in the right sequence | |
| Sentences are simple and short | |
| Simple words are used | |
| Instructions conveyed are informative, specific and not vague | |
| Content is easy to understand | |
| Sentences grammatically correct | |
| The tutorial introduces simple concepts and then gradually moves to the
advanced level |
Quality
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Instructional Design Model followed
(Audio and Video cues) |
|
| Rate the pedagogical approach used | |
| Text in the script is well organized, sectioned and not crowded |
End of the Script
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Rate the quick summary given at the end of the script | |
| The Script does not exceed 7 minutes when read aloud | |
| Assignment given at the end of the tutorial helps improve learning | |
| Rate the expected results at the end of the task given |
URL and other resources
| Criteria | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Information about the source of the external links provided | ||
| External links point to free resources | ||
| External links provided are active | ||
| Information provided in the external links relevant and useful |
STUDY PLAN
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Rate this Study Plan | |
| Rate the sequence of the Tutorials arranged in the study plan | |
| Study Plan corresponds with the listed tutorials | |
| Rate the level of difficulty mentioned in the study plan | |
| Suggestions on topics to make the study plan better
(This is a place where the user can type the text for the topics |
SPOKEN TUTORIAL
Audio
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Audio is loud and clear | |
| Pace of audio is appropriate | |
| Accent in the audio is neutral | |
| Tone is friendly |
Narration
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Easy to understand | |
| Content covered is appropriate |
Video
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Text readable | |
| Irrelevant cursor movements | |
| Video quality | |
| Synchronisation of Video with Audio |
Summary for Spoken Tutorial
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Overall experience | |
| Rate on the teaching method of this spoken tutorial. | |
| Clarity on the concepts discussed in the tutorial |
DUBBING
Script
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Additional content is not introduced in the translated script | |
| None of the original content has been left out | |
| Meaning of the content hasn't changed during translation | |
| Common words like 'computer', 'windows', 'mouse' 'click' 'menu' has been kept neutral
(Not every single word needs to be translated. Changing every word will confuse the |
|
| Simple and short sentences used | |
| Difficult words not used | |
| Instructions conveyed are informative and not vague |
Audio
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Audio loud and clear | |
| Pace of audio is appropriate | |
| Accent in the audio is natural | |
| The tone is friendly |
Narration
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Easy to understand | |
| Content covered appropriate | |
| Dubbed Tutorial corresponds with the original Tutorial |
Video
| Criteria | 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
| Synchronisation of the Audio with the transitions and cursor movement on the screen |
|
| Text readable | |
| Video quality good |
