Difference between revisions of "Admin Checklist Script"

From Process | Spoken-Tutorial
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '===Script=== {| border=1 !Criteria !Yes !No |- |Is the url of the FOSS on mediawiki according to the standard naming convention? | | |- |In case of the first script, is the topic…')
 
(Script)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|In case of the first script, is the topic taken up from the basic level? (Installation need not be the basic level)
+
|Is the first script in the Basic level an overview tutorial?  
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 18: Line 18:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Are the following attachments zipped and linked to the script?
 
|Are the following attachments zipped and linked to the script?
* Slides (pdf/odp)
+
* Slides  
* Source files
+
* Source/Code files
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 31: Line 31:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Are the learning objectives (if any) mentioned in the beginning of the script?
+
|Are the learning objectives mentioned in the beginning of the script?
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Is the utility (if any) of the topic explained briefly?
+
|Is the utility of the topic explained briefly?
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 43: Line 43:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Are the abbreviations/ acronyms/ technical words used in the script, been explained in Glossary?  
+
|Are the use of abbreviations/acronyms avoided in the script?
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Are the technical words used in the script been displayed in '''bold face text'''?  
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 51: Line 55:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Are the slides to accompany descriptive portion?
+
|Are there sufficient slides to accompany the descriptive portion?
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 63: Line 67:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Is there a document supporting Novice/ User feedback?
+
|Is the script ready for Novice and Domain review?
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|

Latest revision as of 20:55, 31 March 2015

Script

Criteria Yes No
Is the url of the FOSS on mediawiki according to the standard naming convention?
Is the first script in the Basic level an overview tutorial?
In case of subsequent scripts, are the scripts of the previous topics submitted?
Are the following attachments zipped and linked to the script?
  • Slides
  • Source/Code files
Is the script submitted in two column tabular format?
Are all the prerequisites mentioned?
Are the learning objectives mentioned in the beginning of the script?
Is the utility of the topic explained briefly?
Are the links active (if any)?
Are the use of abbreviations/acronyms avoided in the script?
Are the technical words used in the script been displayed in bold face text?
Is 75% of the tutorial devoted to demonstration?
Are there sufficient slides to accompany the descriptive portion?
Is a quick recap (if any) of the content taught in the script given at the end of the script?
Are the content mentioned in the "Visual Cues" consistent with the "Narration" ?
Is the script ready for Novice and Domain review?


Contributors and Content Editors

Nancy varkey, Sanmugam