RCL - Revision history

St-admin: Created page with ''''You are here''': Main Page >> Spoken Tutorial Processes >> REVIEWER'S CHECKLIST '''Name of the Reviewer:'''
'''Date:'''
'''Name of the Spoken Tutorial:'''
2012-12-14T07:28:25Z

Created page with ''''You are here''': Main Page >> Spoken Tutorial Processes >> REVIEWER'S CHECKLIST '''Name of the Reviewer:'''<br> '''Date:'''<br> '''Name of the Spoken Tutorial:'''<b…'

New page
'''You are here''': [[Main Page]] >> [[Spoken Tutorial Processes]] >> REVIEWER'S CHECKLIST

'''Name of the Reviewer:'''<br>

'''Date:'''<br>

'''Name of the Spoken Tutorial:'''<br>
<br>
[http://spoken-tutorial.org/process/index.php/RCL/_PDF_Checklists '''click'''] '''here to download PDF forms of the checklists
'''
<br>

'''Ratings to be done on the scale of 1 to 5 wherever required.'''<br>

===TOPIC===

{| border=1
!CRITERIA/STATEMENTS
!YES
!NO
|-
|Is the topic suggested Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)?
|
|
|-
|Is the version number of the Software clearly mentioned?
|
|
|-
|Is any spoken tutorial available in any language on the suggested <br> topic either on the portal or on any link?
|
|
|-
|Is suggested topic Operating System dependent?
|
|
|-
|Is the name of the Operating System clearly mentioned?
|
|
|-
|Is the difficulty level stated by the contributor?
|
|
|-
|}
<br/>

===EXAMPLE===

{| border=1
!CRITERIA/STATEMENTS
!YES
!NO
|-
|Is the example(s) relevant to the topic?
|
|
|-
|Is the example correct and without errors?
|
|
|-
|Is the example(s) easy to understand?
|
|
|-
|Are adequate number of examples illustrated?
|
|
|-
|Would it be difficult to comprehend the topic without this example(s)?
|
|
|-
|According to you, is this the best example(s) that can be used to explain the topic?
|
|
|-
|}
<br/>

===SCRIPT===
=====Beginning of the Script=====

{| border=1
!CRITERIA/STATEMENTS
! 1 to 5
|-
|Brief introduction of the topic is appropriate
|
|-
|Learning objectives mentioned, are clear
|
|-
|Objectives in tandem with the content of the tutorial
|
|-
|Prerequisites mentioned are clear
|
|-
|Mention of the tutorial being a part of a series, is made clear
|
|-
|Name and version of the software is made clear in the script
|
|-
|Mention of the Additional plug-ins required, is clear
|
|-
|}
<br/>

=====Content covered=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Content is covered in an interesting and enthusiastic manner
|
|-
|Script focuses on the key feature(s)
|
|-
|Appropriate explanation of each feature is given in the tutorial
|
|-
|Flow of information is in the right sequence
|
|-
|Sentences are simple and short
|
|-
|Simple words are used
|
|-
|Instructions conveyed are informative, specific and not vague
|
|-
|Content is easy to understand
|
|-
|Sentences grammatically correct
|
|-
|The tutorial introduces simple concepts and then gradually moves to the
advanced level
|
|-
|}
<br>
=====Quality=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Instructional Design Model followed
(Audio and Video cues)
|
|-
|Rate the pedagogical approach used
|
|-
|Text in the script is well organized, sectioned and not crowded
|
|-
|}
<br>

=====End of the Script=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Rate the quick summary given at the end of the script
|
|-
|The Script does not exceed 7 minutes when read aloud
|
|-
|Assignment given at the end of the tutorial helps improve learning
|
|-
|Rate the expected results at the end of the task given
|
|-
|}
<br>

=====URL and other resources=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!Yes
!No
|-
|Information about the source of the external links provided
|
|
|-
|External links point to free resources
|
|
|-
|External links provided are active
|
|
|-
|Information provided in the external links relevant and useful
|
|
|-
|}
<br>

===STUDY PLAN===
{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Rate this Study Plan
|
|-
|Rate the sequence of the Tutorials arranged in the study plan
|
|-
|Study Plan corresponds with the listed tutorials
|
|-
|Rate the level of difficulty mentioned in the study plan
|
|-
|Suggestions on topics to make the study plan better
(This is a place where the user can type the text for the topics <br> that he suggests)
|
|-
|}
<br>

===SPOKEN TUTORIAL===
=====Audio=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Audio is loud and clear
|
|-
|Pace of audio is appropriate
|
|-
|Accent in the audio is neutral
|
|-
|Tone is friendly
|
|-
|}
<br>

=====Narration=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Easy to understand
|
|-
|Content covered is appropriate
|
|-
|}
<br>

=====Video=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Text readable
|
|-
|Irrelevant cursor movements
|
|-
|Video quality
|
|-
|Synchronisation of Video with Audio
|
|-
|}
<br>

=====Summary for Spoken Tutorial=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Overall experience
|
|-
|Rate on the teaching method of this spoken tutorial.
|
|-
|Clarity on the concepts discussed in the tutorial
|
|-
|}
<br>

===DUBBING===

=====Script=====
{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Additional content is not introduced in the translated script
|
|-
|None of the original content has been left out
|
|-
|Meaning of the content hasn't changed during translation
|
|-
|Common words like 'computer', 'windows', 'mouse' 'click' 'menu' has been kept neutral

(Not every single word needs to be translated. Changing every word will confuse the <br> listeners. Again this could change the meaning of the content)
|
|-
|Simple and short sentences used
|
|-
|Difficult words not used
|
|-
|Instructions conveyed are informative and not vague
|
|-
|}
<br>

=====Audio=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Audio loud and clear
|
|-
|Pace of audio is appropriate
|
|-
|Accent in the audio is natural
|
|-
|The tone is friendly
|
|-
|}
<br>

=====Narration=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Easy to understand
|
|-
|Content covered appropriate
|
|-
|Dubbed Tutorial corresponds with the original Tutorial
|
|-
|}
<br>

=====Video=====

{| border=1
!Criteria
!1 to 5
|-
|Synchronisation of the Audio with the transitions and cursor movement <br> on the screen
|
|-
|Text readable
|
|-
|Video quality good
|
|-
|}
<br>